Quote:
Originally Posted by phormwatch
Someone has suggested to me in a PM that I drop dabs.com from the diagram. The reason being that it is actually a pretty sound company (I agree) and that it has nothing to do with Phorm at all.
I originally put dabs.com there so people can put more pressure on BT through a boycott.
What do people think? Should we get dabs involved? Keep it? Remove it?
|
I'd leave it on there. Many people don't realise they're linked, and anything that brings pressure on BT is a good thing.
Bear in mind too, suppose BT blacklist Dabs, but not Dixons, Action Electronics, RS, JohnLewis... Dabs will gain an unfair competitive advantage because its private unencrypted communications are not being used to profile customers.
I'd be interested to know what
other business BT own, so I can boycott them too.
---------- Post added at 09:36 ---------- Previous post was at 09:08 ----------