[BadPhormula]

Originally Posted by BetBlowWhistler

I'll second this. JR is a top bloke, and if for a second I thought he had been involved in this product I would a) have been surprised and b) would probably have trusted their claims a little more.

Anyone involved in network security will take about 2 seconds to discover who this person is as he is quite visible in the community. Campaigners might even be able to email him directly using the old firstname.lastname@domainname that is used at BT. Nuff said.

It's also worth pointing out that anything added or removed from BT's network (be it BT Retail or other group members) is subject to a change request being approved.

This CR has many details, such as a summary of the intended purpose, backout plans, and a list of approval groups that need to sign it off before it can be added to the network.

I can't imagine something that is placed in such a crucial position in the network would not have a CR. It would nice if that information made it into the public domain wouldn't it ?

Hail the honest whistleblowers that have to live with their conscience!
three cheers