Peter N

So the question remains - why is Privacy International, an organisation that describes itself as "Human rights "watchdog" organization focused on privacy intrusions by government and businesses" so quiet on the subject of Phorm?

This is the same organisation that complained about Google - Kent's favourite target - in writing to the European Commission and included the statement "The entire domain of online advertising is in great need of some transparency and accountability to both nurture it and to ensure that consumers are protected."

It's not possible that PI are unaware of the issue and it falls entirely within their remit so why are they distancing themselves from this?