Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter N
Privacy International shouldn't need to dragged into this - they should be making a statement to make their position in the matter clear. I am appalled that they have avoided the entire subject and I think it is disgusting that Simon Davies has undertaken a contract with Phorm for financial gain.
I appreciate his comments posted elsewhere that he makes no money from PI but if that's a problem then he should stand down and then he can sell his talents to whomever he choses but until that time he has let everyone down who looked to him for and PI to support freedom and privacy.
|
Actually, and although I can't give any details of this away, he has not made any financial gain from the Phorm PIA, if you knew what the money was actually be used for you might not be so quick to criticise.
Anyway I don't want this to deteriorate into a Simon Davies bashing party *again* (as it has on a number of occassions), I merely felt the diagram should be factually accurate.
It should also be noted that Simon Davies does not have a contract with Phorm, 80/20 Thinking does, the diagram currently indicates that the contract is directly with Simon.
Alexander Hanff