Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Advocate
What flaw in my argument ?
Yes, opinions, that's just what they are (on both sides), and until proven to be facts and judged to be so, that's all they ever will be.
D_A
|
Well going back to this post
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/34...post12119.html
You require proof. Not one persons legal opinion vs another. Until BT submit a test case or the Met and CPS decide to prosecute based upon Alex's submission and that wades through the myrad of cases and appeals into the house of lords you will never have proof just two opinions.
At the moment BT / PHorm had only said they sought legal guidance. They have never provided support on this and this may only be on aspects of the law. For example the system probably complies with the Data Protection Act (or could be argued to), thus, they have an opinion from a lawyer saying so. But do they have one for all the laws mentioned in this thread. Did they go to a law firm with the open question of if we do this is this legal or did they go to the firm with does this break the x law?
EDIT - Jeez - I'm not typing fast enough today - I'ts 9.30 shouldn't you all be down the pub?