Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Advocate
More 'they said' !
It will be up to a Court of Law to prove the illegality of the case, not those who 'state' that it is illegal ... that's if it ever gets to court, which is very unlikely.
D_A
|
Thanks for pointing out the main flaw in your own arguement. Until this is put before a judge and both sides argued both sides are entitled to their opinions. BT and Phorm that it was legal and many others that it was not. At this point BT and Phorm have not supplied anything to counter the arguments put forward by the others, just stated that they sought legal advice.
---------- Post added at 16:04 ---------- Previous post was at 16:03 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob M
Worth noting that, in intercepting the communication and sending it to the Phorm servers, they are making it available to the Administrators of those servers (who would presumably be neither the originating sender, or the intended recipient of the original transmission).
Just a thought  |
That and the debug logs that will be maintained for a short time to enable analysis of the servers and any problems. They will be looked at by people.