View Single Post
Old 18-07-2008, 20:46   #18
c_r
cf.addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 251
c_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud ofc_r has much to be proud of
Re: Dwain Chambers set for Olympic verdict

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J View Post
So?What sort of argument is that?Just because other countries aren't so particular is no reason for us to drop our standards.We are an example of true respect for sportsmanship by sticking to this rule.
I'm not saying that we should drop our standards but that other countries should raise theirs. At the very least there needs to be a level playing field or the Olympics become completely devalued. What's the point of the medal table when some countries are allowed athletes who have been found to take drugs and some countries aren't?

There also seems to be an element of picking on him because he is higher profile. The shot putter Carl Myerscough was also banned for 2 years for taking drugs (and, like most drug cheats, still protests his innocence) yet there was virtually no mention of him when he took part recently in the World Indoor Athletics Championships - all the stick seemed to be reserved for Chambers. And of course let's not forget Linford Christie who is still revered amongst some in UK athletics circles yet was found to have been taking drugs at the end of his career, thus nullifying all his previous achievements.
c_r is offline   Reply With Quote