I still dont get how the charles stanley securites document says that all 3 isp's have undertaken extensive trials of phorm and financial times today also re-iterates this that all 3 isp's did extensive trials yet the ico dont know anything about ANY trials on any isp, got to be really laughable at best.
If people were to go and do a bit investigation somewhere i.e forums or isp reviews and look at user feedback and discussions about boosts in degredation on internet on said isp's during such times as contract changes in 2007 not really hard to see that something was indeed going down with all isp's in 2007, and as in the leaked bt 2006 document the 2007 trials were going to be all about invisibility (even with all the redirects) and nothing to do with serving ads
.