Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
Indeed and many thanks for PG from inphormation desk for producing the flier text in a language which was comprehensive to the general public. We handed out over 1000 fliers today and they all went to interested parties as opposed to just shoving them into the hands of random passers by.
One very interesting situation which I almost forgot. There were some BT OpenReach lawyers there who discussed the system with one of the campaigners and until then had no idea that it was even happening. There were some very frantic phone calls made by them to their colleagues and they took a fist full of fliers with them to discuss the matter further.
Alexander Hanff
|
And I hope VM have some proper lawyers also. Too much of this Pro Phorm legal analysis by 'unknown' bodies may been dreamt of as far as I am concerned
If anybody has a Pro-Phorm/Webwise proper legal analysis that is compliant with UK (or maybe even English, Scottish, Irish or Welsh) Laws that they can they quote and they will happily put forward for analysis, we would be very interested.
It is really becoming a bit boring having quotes from American companies regurgitated by Phorm long ago about unrelated laws that currently do not hold true now in their own country (USA). There are some very tough questions currently being asked to ISP's by the powers that be in the states about similar DPI interceptions.
Did I hear a nervous laugh?
I am very baffled that this UK Webwise/Phorm possibility is even still on the agenda sheets.