Hank

So, a BT spokesman has now said BT had sought legal advice during previous trials of the technology in 2006 and 2007 and added the words "always acted in good faith" to the statement eh?

Now that is different to the line they have been spinning since the start of April when Emma-le-le-legal started trying to defend their position!! Me thinks this is the start of a turn around from them in the face of a clear recognition that the le-le-legal advice they "sought" (but did not "receive"??) was (or would have been??) completely wrong and telling them not to intercept the communication of their customers with lawful authority.

Re the protest against Deep Packet Inspection which VM, BT and CWTT still won't rule out... Well done people. And less anyone suggests, that whatever the numbers in attendance were, is a reflection of the number of people who will make a stand against it... Wrong. I was not there and I won't rest whilst this is still being considered in the UK or Europe as a whole.

---------- Post added at 18:51 ---------- Previous post was at 18:49 ----------

Yes, well said. Phorm, we are all ears and reasonable people, educated and willing to be shown how what we have learned so far is wrong and what we have worked out is incorrect. I'll listen if there's new info to consider.