Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonHickling
Another vote for academic / technical breach of copyright
Quote:
|
Strictly speaking there's an argument that a system like Phorm infringes copyright by copying and analysing pages for the purpose of serving ads elsewhere. In reality, I can't see site operators doing anything about that.
|
|
That bit in bold. That is factually wrong. More factually wrong than the statement "Elvis lives!".
More wrong than you could possibly ever be wrong.
And perhaps I may be able prove it soon, with a little help from a friend.
