I agree Mad
But theres no harm in trying. If a Vote of No Confidence can't be held, then there will be other ways...
... Directly questioning the viability of the investment to date in regards of Phorm
... Questioning the increase of wages and Dividends for the Board when they are responsible for the Illegal Trials - and balance this with the potential damage to BT as a Company
Just one failed re-election, after a reference to Phorm will be a massive success, and with the Press and Financial experts at the AGM - this will send a huge message, and may well push the Phorm fiasco into Mainstream Media and keep it there.