Please understand Florence et al, but I don't know as much as you all regarding the issue. I used to work for Doubleclick, but I didn't see myself as an evil person...just someone who needed a paycheck to survive in NYC with my family at the time. I was in Engineering QA'ing our products.
While I understand the sales folks and upper management have a bit more that they are preaching, the point still is that my post was about inappropriate business practices towards little ole me. I didn't know I would go viral and get wrapped up in a cause that you all are working on. I respect your comments & your thoughts, but I don't want to be threatened or criticized for simply deactivating and taking my time in thinking this through.
I had a hard time in posting the first post about their behavior. It took me a solid 2+ hours to recollect all the emails & recount step by step what happened. I was angry from a standpoint that they just simply did something wrong as far as calling, but I do acknowledge they have other people to talk to. I just wish they would of made it VERY CLEAR that I was not on the priority list -- which up through today, I'm still confused a little frustrated.
I didn't get all the answers I wanted from the apology, but again, I thought of his daughter when he was making a plea...not Phorm. I may still put it back up, again, if any of the claims are wrong or still not as true as I feel they may or may not be. I'm still a little fuming over the whole thing, but I don't want to be responsible for someone being depressed if it truly was a mistake and potentially a family. That's all...
Anyway, onward...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Florence
Welcome to the forum, I did post on the last one but I always use my name posting as anon isn't my style...
I can see your side of this sadly I still see you as being used, they used you in Korea, right now their shareholders are watching the floor fall out from underneath them. Phorm manipulate all the time take part quotes that are good and selectively avoid the negative even if linked in the same paragraph.
What you put up would have caused more companies to be scepticle of them he wasn't pleeding for himself it was more for the company as your daming evidance that the use people for their own gain.
Something we have said all along there isnt that much difference look at it this way the patent on this can go so far that nothing on your PC is safe if and I say if the programmer decides to change the get commands.
Now look at what thye did to you think about it can you trust them to be on the ISP network and keep thier word they will not dig deaper into your system to gather personal data?
Could you trust them to pay you your commission earned pimping your customers?
Many businessses are run on trust if you cannot trust them how can you work with them, allow them access to your customers?
See your events showed they promise but do not deliver that is the only reason for the begging you had shown them for what they are users.. plain and simple.
I do have a copy saved to my pc strange really since I was transcritpting the chat with the Earl of Northesk so didn't read it all so the page was still in the browser by the time i was going to reply I had already seen you had removed it.
I shouldn't hold my breath for anything from them they are takers and users about to change the way the WWW works and dont get it wrong if they get into the networks world wide they can hold every country to ransome, they can change content we see on the screen from the page we requested..
Would you trust your life to them if you were hanging off a ledge hundreds of feet up and only them to keep you alive?
I will leave you to ponder on that one have fun.
|