View Single Post
Old 09-07-2008, 15:36   #11452
Dephormation
Inactive
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Services: Aquiss.net and loving it. No more Virgin Media, no more Virgin Phone, no more Virgin Mobile.
Posts: 629
Dephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to allDephormation is a name known to all
Thumbs down Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank View Post

Well the leaked report says they intercepted the communications to see what their customers were doing. It says that thay did it without telling (or ASKING) customers. And it does not say that they had a legal warrant/authority from a court. Ergo, illegal interception. So the Police should request an original copy of that report from BT (leaked one is undoubtedly real but probably does not count), review it and inerview Emma or someone else to see if they had a legal warrant to do it. That's the evidence needed by the CPS, isn't it?

They did it. They were not told to. They did not ask to. Illegal under RIPA.
... not forgetting that the 2006 trial was 18,000 people, the 2007 trail was hundreds of thousands.

It is the documentation from the 2007 trial that would likely be even more damning, and it is only the Police who would be able to raid the ISPs and arrest directors to obtain that information. BT did not provide that data to the ICO (nor did the ICO ask for it, for reasons I can't comprehend).

By prevaricating, the Police have given ISPs ample time to destroy evidence of the 2007 trial.

I sincerely hope someone, somewhere has a copy of that evidence they are willing to turn over to a corruption free Police enquiry, if not this forum too.
Dephormation is offline