Thread: Wimbledon 2008
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2008, 00:19   #25
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,791
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Wimbledon 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/6385295.stm

Yes they are. If the women can't play up to 5 sets then IMO they don't deserve equal prize money on the grounds of equality. If they can play 5 sets then let them do so or reduce the men to best of 3.
Yes, That is stupid.

5 set matchs mean the men have to work more, will feel greater physical stress post-match, and are at an increased risk of injury (because of their physical condition). The pay should reflect that.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote