Quote:
Originally Posted by SelfProtection
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by warescouse
|
those don't help me a my site is hosted and i do not have access to iis manager, to make things a bit worse the site is html only, i can use scripts on the site as it has fp extension
if not i make have to bring it inhouse at home and then i can do what i want
may be a short term solution to get the point over to BT, i have dyndns setup so i can port forward to a server
peter
peter
---------- Post added at 22:06 ---------- Previous post was at 22:01 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Jones
Look I have to take issue with that scurrilous accusation. Phorm did NOT waste lots of money rebranding. They nicked the logo, and the name of the company and they nicked the name of the product. After all they were already in use on the internet, so that made them fair game. The logo and the company name was copied from a very decent design company in Sheffield/Barnsley, and the product name was nicked from the BBC. I don't think any of their names/logos are copyrighted for that very reason - they were already nicked.
So you see your accusation that they wasted money on rebranding is very very unfair. They did it on the cheap. Virtually free in fact. Cool.
|
rob i did not say they spent a load of money, just "the money they spent" the logo and name came cheap but what about the time of
" 5 PR AGENCIES" that would have been more than a round of drinks
peter