Thread: Wimbledon 2008
View Single Post
Old 01-07-2008, 15:11   #17
Saaf_laandon_mo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Re: Wimbledon 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by peanutkp View Post
Still doesn't change the way I feel about him, he's not the right role model for the sport (yet). And I wasn't disputing his ability on the court.

Henman just wasn't good enough, nothing to do with being nice etc. Murray is a bad loser, and don't have the right qualities to be a winner even if he does actually win the tournament.
I think there is a difference between not wanting/liking to lose and being a bad loser. I haven't seen Murray act or say anything ungracious in defeat. He doesn't like to lose, but thats what will eventually make him a winner?

Bad role model for the sport? He trains hard, he is focused on winning, he's a nice chap outside Tennis. Dont see anything wrong in that.

He definately has the right attitude to win a tournament. He is confident, a touch arrogant both attributes that can instill some fear/doubt in opponents, he is talented too. Did you see some of the shots he played yesterday?

As much as I like Nadal, - after yesterday's epic match I'd have no qualms with Murray beating him tomorrow. In fact I will be rooting for him tomorrow.
Saaf_laandon_mo is offline   Reply With Quote