Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing
Many people have personal health problems that could be used as a reason for this and that and thats why it's pointless. Also i DON'T smoke anymore i can just see it from the smoker's side of the argument having once been a smoker and no one ever inhaled my smoke as i didn't smoke in pub's. Thats the thing in this whole debate no one wants to see anyone's else's side of the argument and as i have said it's pointless now as smoking is banned in enclosed public places.
|
Its not pointless at all. Breathing in smoke wether or not you have a health problem IS dangerous for your health. This is a point blank fact, the lungs are not designed to breath in smoke, thats not how the Human body works. This has nothing to do with none smokers being selfish, only we cant fathem out why it is so much bother to go and smoke 20 metres which is outside, rather than make everyone breath it in, of which some of them people might have health problems, like myself.
Also there is no smokers side to the argument, they are arguing for arguments sake and I have seen all the arguements they come up with, none of which top the most important factor in debates about this topic, the persons health who is sat a few chairs away from the smoker, who either before the ban had no choice of either not going to the pub or going and suffering, not just from health problems, but stinking also. Walking 20 metres outside to smoke for 3 minutes, is much better than a smoke filled pub and much better than sending customers who want a none smoking pub, 1 mile down the road.