Quote:
Originally Posted by gnilddif
Useful thanks tdadyslexia.
2. The page appears to be a blatant breach of the new regulations regarding Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading; http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/bus.../oft931int.pdf
BT must ensure that the main characteristics of the product are clear – benefits of the product, risks of the product, and especially the motives of the commercial practice. It is obvious that BT’s real motive behind BTWebwise is to collect revenue from selling BT customers’ browsing habits to phorm. The promise of anti-phishing technology and better-suited advertising is a smoke-screen. This is a blatant Misleading Omission that can’t be justified by hiding it away in the small print of the T&Cs, if that is BT’s intention. BT must inform customers more comprehensively than this if it is to demonstrate that due diligence that it keeps trumpeting.
gnilddif |
gnilddif,
you need to be careful about the selling of data,
if you read what they do they do not sell the data as they own (it is gifted to them by phorm) the dpi kit and adserver, they get a share of the revenue from the adverts served, subtle difference i know but they can simply argue they do not sell the data and ignore point 2
peter
---------- Post added at 13:22 ---------- Previous post was at 13:20 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by amanfromMars
Surely Private Phorms/MetaDataMining Operations in an Administered State will result in First Party Knowledge into Third Party hands for Trade with First Party's who would be buying their needs rather than being supplied with their feeds. Thus creating a captive capitalist state. ..... is one scenario.
And that is surely a gross indecent act against the State. Make a wrong move and it can be treasonable. 
x integer > O = AIR&dD
Per Ardua, Quantum Solace in Deed. |
english please not martian !!
anyone notice this
http://www.out-law.com/page-9209
seems like the ico can have some small teeth for other gov dept's just not bt or phorm
peter