Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
More documents.
Home Office cover note from their advice document makes clear they have been involved with Phorm for 'some time' prior to January 2008... Details here
Update; the cover letter originated from Simon Watkin (see email address in the header) |
ok, so the HO are caught out AGAIN:
Quote:
...You were interested in the view of the Home Office on your Client's proposal for the roll out of an internet based advertising service in the uk.
I am now able to let you have our considered view.
|
Is this the same HO who stated that the document was NOT specifically produced for Phorm???
I smell a rat - it can be SAFELY assumed that a request for the document had been made; subsequently a 'generalised' view had been created by the HO, built around the Phorm System...
I'd love to see the HO beat that rap....
EDIT: Complaint being drafted re HO blatant 'Croneyism'.
EDIT 2: Try not to differentiate two Government bodies whilst kids screaming at yer feet ....