Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
Well I guess I should have expected this sooner or later. Someone has added https://nodpi.org to Spam Cops spam lists because Entanet mentioned the protest with a link to the site in one of their partner newsletters.
I have been in communications with the party who filed the report and advised them to remove it. Apparently they don't want to receive Entanet newsletters any more so they feel the appropriate course of action is to pick one domain out of the entire newsletter and add it to a spam list as opposed to just unsubscribing from the newsletter.
If NoDPI.Org goes offline in the next 24 hours it is because we have not managed to resolve this issue. Our hosting provider take spam very seriously and have threatened to suspend our service should the issue not be dealt with within 24 hours.
Personally I think this wreaks of malicious intent, there is no way I can see a logical argument for reporting a single URL from a newsletter to a spam list as a valid or natural reaction to not wanting to receive the newsletter. One would expect the party to simply unsubscribe from said newsletter as opposed to taking offensive action against a single entity mentioned within the newsletter.
Needless to say the matter is being taken very seriously and Entanet have been contacted as well to help resolve the issue.
I apologise if there is any downtime.
Alexander Hanff |
it seems most logical, the attempt at subverting the AntiDPI Protest, probably came directly from this very thread.
after all, the failing Phorm Advocates and investers are all reading every word you, and others here type Alexander, we do have the best and most informed and helpful thread the internet can offer in innovative idea's and help, hay, we even get house of lords posting
,not to mention several House of Lords,representatives of the counties, cities, boroughs, and universities, forming the House of Commons etc reading the thread to stay informed, and welcome all, register and post away.
alas some Pro_phorm Investors/readers
might have got the idea from a comment here the other day and thought ,ohh i dont know why i didnt think of that...and off they went.
its a high possibility that the same IP that reported your site matches an Ip visiting this thread, (they wouldnt be that silly and inept would they?........).
is it going to need some court time i wonder, if thats the case, no point in being shy, big hefty damages, etc would be the order of the day,a few injunctions, a court ordered documents and computer files discovery or two if you/we were forced down that path, might as well make it informative and full of publicly available court documents to the wider world watching.
its not just a big players game anymore, the End Users are learning fast, thanks to the Bank charges forcing us to learn the law of the land (see CAG etc)and forced to bring court cases to get some form of action and justice, do the ISP's and the boardroom Executive etc think they are any more protected than the Banks are!, i wonder.
do the corporations really want to go up against the worlds web Techs in this battle, again i wonder if they have thought that through, word of mouth is a VERY powerful thing, and the british bulldog spirit might still be alive in all of us yet....if pushed to far.