View Single Post
Old 20-06-2008, 20:10   #9702
mark777
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Services: 0.4 Mbps BB + Phone
Posts: 447
mark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of lightmark777 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff View Post
Don't forget those damages extend to all the -time- you have spent on this issue as well, including the time you have spent in the last couple of months trying to get information from ICO, any time you spent troubleshooting the problem and any time you spent buying a new computer and setting it up. All this time should be billed at your professional rate and will probably add up to a lot more than the cost of the actual computer itself.

Then you should apply for punitive damages if you feel your company was negatively effected by the situation (for example, did you lose any potential customers due to downtime, did you have any problems which were noticed by your clients which could have led to a negative opinion of your professionalism).

Don't just hold the damages at the cost of the PC, you have spent, I expect, hundreds if not thousands of hours on this issue and BT should be liable for all of that.

Alexander Hanff
How much should be added for human rights violation?

Would not an award on this issue imply a criminal action and open the floodgates to other claims?
mark777 is offline