[HamsterWheel]

- why Phorm is legal, BECAUSE NO-ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT IS NOT
- why the notable individuals and organisations are wrong, THESE ARE ORGANISATIONS WHOSE PURPOSE IS TO SAY NO TO EVERYTHING, SO OF COURSE THEY WILL BE ANTI-EVERYTHING, THE LUDDITES.
- where the legal advice provided to people like Phorm and BT came from and why it isn't being proffered every chance they get to kill this point stone dead THAT WILL BE COMMERCIALLY CONFIDENTIAL, YOU KNOW, PRIVATE !

without even starting on:

- why we should trust Phorm at all in the absence of the above (company history, omission of info to HO, secret BT trials, spin of info from HO, hosting shenanigans etc etc) BECAUSE ICO WHOSE JOB IT IS TO MONITOR ARE HAPPY WITH PHORM
- why has the BT trial been delayed since March NO DOUBT SO MORE CONTROLS AND OPT-OUTS CAN BE INCORPORATED TO KEEP YOU LOT LESS UNHAPPY
- why have VM (to an extent) and the Guardian (totally) distanced themselves from the product BECAUSE THEY ARE WIMPS WHO WILL SOON ADOPT ONCE THE DOSH ROLLS IN TO BT ETC.
- why did CPW feel it necessary to change the way they are looking to implement the system THEY ARE ENTITLED TO DO WHAT THEY WANT - THE TECH IS EVOLVING
- why the share price has gone tank tank tankety tank over the last few months ERR, SO HAVE THE MARKETS, AND SURELY THIS IS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU PRIVACY WORRIERS, BUT BEST LEFT TO INVESTORS TO DISCUSS