Quote:
Originally Posted by HamsterWheel
Florence - I am not phorm or Kent or Phorm's PR.
I'm an ordinary shareholder who thinks Phorm is a good investment and does not impinge everyone's privacy in any meaningful way.
Even Alex (who posts on my board frequently) does not think I'm Phorm.
|
Bearing in mind that the majority of antiphorm writers on this site are either IT specialists or have legal vocations, I really cannot think how an ordinary investor (without any of these skills), can put up any technical or legal argument that could convince us otherwise.
Every independent legal analysis I have seen (Those not in the pay of Phorm or hold shares in Phorm) clearly have shown its illegal. Don't quote American legal analysis. it doesn't wash over here. Different legal system.
BT have stated they have legal advice. What they have not stated is where that legal advice comes from!
Again, independent IT persons (again not in the pay of Phorm) who have studied the system also verify this via their analysis. You have a motive for supporting Phorm if you are an investor. My advice would be for you to sell because in the long term Phorm will be gone!