Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace
My contingency plan is to riing up VM and cancel. No web page needed.
If this gets implemented then VM along with Phorm don't give a hoot about legalities ergo you can forget about contracts and the OFT.
|
its up to you OC Horace, but you would be wise to make the effort and make sure you ALWAYS write that final Official "Notice" of termination AND send it registered post.
that WILL cover your bases when it comes to having proof that VM,BT or whoever, were intentionally placing bogus charges on your then non existant bill and forwarding its bogus data to the CRA's (a very dangerous place for them to be..).
that is sure to place these companys in the hot seat if you decide to have some fun with them in the SC courts.
see "moneyclaim" small claims site, and the CAG threads site.
---------- Post added at 19:01 ---------- Previous post was at 18:18 ----------
Alexander and the gang, you might like to post a comment to
Lilian's (a very nice lady by all accounts)
"
panGloss
A UK-based cyberlaw blog by Lilian Edwards. Specialising in online privacy and security law, cybercrime, online intermediary law (including eBay and Google law), e-commerce, digital property and whatever captures my eye:-) Based at
ILAWS, the INstitute for Law and the Web at Southampton
Blog.
it would be so benefitial to readers here to get a few more "
personal [but Officially trained] views" from Lilian, and her fully trained peers, students etc
(Without prejudice etc OR a bill is to follow
OC
), to help us on our way were possible and time permits.
most on my mind to be cleared up one way or the other is, how someone on a lower income might make a court "Injunction" against a named ISP Executive, Board room ,or Upper Manager (to make them personally and/or directly responsible for any DPI for profit law breaking they authorise etc)for instance......
is the small claims court system a real option to these people for instance....
http://blogscript.blogspot.com/2008/06/its-amazing.html