Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
so basicly if the authorities caught osama bin laden in London ,you'd let him go free after 28 days ,just because more time was needed to gather evidence, i cant see a problem with 42 days [you ask for a reason for this ] i can give you 52 reasons ,thats how many people died 7/7/05 in the london bombings, or how about the twin towers in new york ,all of those people had the right to be safe . but not if the bleeding heart liberal do-gooders get there way . the world has changed since 9/11 ,how can one persons liberty be more important than the safety of thousands.
|
You think they'd need 28 days to build a case against him?
Would you be happy to be locked up for 42 days?
There is no evidence to support your notion that it would have taken 42 days to build a case against the 9/11 bombers or the 7/7 ones either.
Of those who've been held for nearly 28 days, about half were innocent.
Try to realise we're not talking about terrorists here, we're talking about suspects, which so far half have been held for nearly 28 days after doing absolutely nothing illegal.