Thread: Why dont VM offer a flexible "family pack" ?
View Single Post
Old 11-06-2008, 01:25   #13
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Why dont VM offer a flexible "family pack" ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb View Post
so who pays the bills when one of those go over and the others do not? do not see this as a feasible idea personally
As others have said, this is common over here. You pay for a family talk plan and then an extra $9.95 a line, the minutes and texts etc are on a first come first served basis rather than you needing to apportion in advance.
http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-pho...equestid=20414
Was just thinking but Orange used to do this, or was it that they just allowed multiple phones in the same house to go on the same bill.
Just looking at my last Orange Pay Monthly bill and I was listed as being on Core Plan 19 so I guess that was a legacy contract style.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote