Quote:
Originally Posted by Florence
Alex don't give in on this Emma is desperate I think she has realised with Ian moving up she might be the fall guy or women, if this goes bad for BT.
Personally I think Ian also brought BT's name into disrepute thinking about adding Phorm to the network so both should resign or AGM vote a no confidance in them.
Sadly the last might not be that easy since they increased the company shares to almost match the voting shareholders shares. This is a sign of a company desp.
|
Just a comment & definitely not aimed at anyone, don't forget that BT & Phorm have been planning this for 2-3 Years, so watch out for Posters/Supporters who claim to be on your side, but slowly try to sideline the debate.
After the Leaked Report, I have noticed the possible re-immergence of some of these "dog in the mangers", trying some damage limitation around the WWW.
---------- Post added at 11:42 ---------- Previous post was at 11:35 ----------
[QUOTE=vicz;34570098]Did they ever answer the question over exactly how they will supposedly avoid processing password protected forums? I remember K*nt saying they would not process password protected content, but I don't remember him saying how. The reason I bring this up is that it is one area where consent to view can be definitely shown to have been denied. (There is always the argument of a reasonable expectation of consent for 'published' website even if subsequently found to have disclaimers).
In order to guarantee that they have not visited a Password Protected Site, I believe they would have to look at the Form Fields.
I thought I read or heard in one of the interviews, that this is something this system is supposed to avoid? (could be wrong though, it's difficult to keep up with this thread & others.)