Quote:
Originally Posted by popper
hmm, is a rewrite in order there, or are they intentionally re-writing the facts to suit their personal stance?
"
During the trials adverts were stripped out of web pages served up to BT customers and replaced with more targeted ads, if available.
If none were available, adverts for one of three charities were inserted. "
|
Does it matter how it is put the fact it is on record BT told ICO that no adverts were placed before the customers this report shows this is incorrect this needs to be corrected and BT need to face the music over it. How can the ICO trust reports from BT from now on if they still hide behind they I don't know, we didn't, it was small scale, no data was kept or processed. They need to work on regaining trust and one step in right direction is like Alexander be honest and admit your faults..
I do get the feeling Ian wil have made himself safe so it could be Emma's head on the chopping block since she was the one on TV still spinning the half truths publicly.. Sorry but before I would have lied on air would have got a sick note and made someone else go in my place I just can't lie and hate those who constantly do to improve their lifestyle or bank balance....
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilago
|
MPO BT wanted to stealthily move webwise into the network and then fool those who are easily taken in those who have tenencies to paranioa over security without telling them they are being stalked all over the interent every page they read is logged and harvested, we only have kents and BT's word this information isnt stored going from recent events is this word trustworthy?