Which part of "the advertisements were used to replaced [sic] a 'default' charity advertisement" have I not understood.
Replacing 'worthless' charity ads with holiday ads, pet insurance, banks, and Weight Watchers ads is simply
sick.
I don't care who paid, I don't care how the campaign was structured, I don't care which agency.
Bill Hicks
hit it on the nail. (warning strong language)
Unbelievable.