Heres one instance where there is mention, and anticipation, of the publication of a full PIA “in March 2008″
http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2008/...e-phorm-storm/
To be honest, considering the length of time it is taking, between the actual assessment and the latest publish date (June 13th), which is approximately two months, I would question whether the PIA will be relevant bearing in mind the developments in the area of privacy during that time.
Nicholas Bohm's legal analysis, 23rd April, is published.
Richard Claytons third draft of the webwise system, 18th May, is published.
...Shortly afterwards it transpires there are FOUR redirections occurring! (Fourth draft?)
The way in which webwise is to be delivered (by BT) for the trial has changed several times in light of the ICO's revised statement (it should be opt-in), is hosted outside the BT network (and outside the UK at one point)
The EU Commission states its position in respect of privacy and Phorm.
... the fact that there has to be explicit informed consent from ALL parties - not just acceptance of terms and conditions as suggested by the incompetent Home Office.
Are any of these points likely to be taken into account and feature in the final document?