Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian Smart
I'm still wondering why 80/20 are still working with Phorm given that this clause of their ethics policy has presumably been violated (no videos of the Phorm meeting):
"Any instance of deception or dishonesty by an 80/20 client during the course of our work will result in the termination of that relationship.".
|
Yeah... We're all still wondering the same thing Julian (even Alexander is probably shaking his head but like he says, someone needs to try and work with these 3rd party plonkers like K*nt or we'll not know what's going on until it is too late)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian Smart
All power to the Earl of Northesk contending with that lot.
|
Another good point. Although going by the current speed of the GOvernment's answers, it will be Christmas before he gets any answers to new questions.
From here:
http://www.publications.parliament.u...d/ldordpap.htm
Questions asked: 24 April
Due for answer: 8 May
HL3267 Earl of Northesk [HO]
HL3268 Earl of Northesk [HO]
Come on Home Office... The Earl is waiting for answers, my MP is waiting for answers, I'm waiting... BT are probably waiting. In fact I bet the ICO, Police, Kent and his concerned investors are even waiting ...We're all bleedin' waiting!!
Hank