View Single Post
Old 18-05-2008, 15:16   #13
homealone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Natural disaster made in to man made catastrophe

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf View Post
I disagree, and there are provisions for intervention in the UN rule book:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_to_protect

http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/



The people of Burma tried to sort it out just a few months ago. They got shot at. They tried in 1988. Troops fired at the crowds. 3,000 people died.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/7012158.stm

We invaded Iraq, and when no Weapons of Mass Destruction were found, regime change was quoted as the reason for intervention. If the international community is serious about human rights, then this is the time to show it imo.
In a way I'm glad you disagree, I thought very hard before stating my opinion, but still feel somewhat ambivalent.

The R2P agenda is very laudable & I wouldn't disagree with its main tenets one little bit.

The problem I had was that, as you pointed out, the 'situation' in Burma is one of long standing, the cyclone has only made that worse.

My opinion was stated on the premise that if the junta in Burma won't allow international aid in the face of a natural disaster, then in the short term we appear to have only two choices - somehow force them to accept the aid offered, or withdraw the offer....

Longer term, of course we should continue to seek a solution to the overall troubles in Burma, but tragically that doesn't address their immediate need, as I personally cannot see the use of force in this particular case as viable or if it was, capable of being done fast enough to provide the help people need right now ....
  Reply With Quote