Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget
So, a drunk man makes a comment to someone that may be racial? Do you know what the comment was? I don't, but I'm also willing to accept that, in the heat of the moment, something inappropriate may have been said. However, how do we know that no comments were made to the accused?
|
what difference does that make? the law makes the distinction between a racial attack and as far as im concerned it cuts both ways even if both parties are racsist. However I think the discinction should be in law and the fact it is imo is discrimatory towards white men as its a lot less likely for them to go to the police saying he called me names. This case brings the old kids saying "STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAK MY BONES BUT NAMES WILL NEVER HURT ME" this guy used a stick and broke bones any names made no difference
---------- Post added at 13:58 ---------- Previous post was at 13:57 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo
Just curious, why wooden and not aliminium though? Would you still not be able to drill through aluminium, or would the edges around the hole eventually cut into the leather?
And slightly back on topic, no knife or bricks or anything else was found at the scene i dont hink. Well he could have used his beer can (Assuming he had one)
|
Well drilling ali is a bit of a waste of a nice bat
I know for a fact if I had to I could rip someones throat out with my bare hands or kick someone to death if the situation demanded it so it still could have resulted in death irrelevent of the bat