View Single Post
Old 14-05-2008, 08:42   #23
Paddy1
cf.addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 352
Paddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond reputePaddy1 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: whats your opinion on this ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing View Post
Oh thats a good policy Paddy we have light sentencing because the criminal is less likely to do major harm to a victim .
Ask the victim which they'd prefer. I'd imagine they'd rather be alive even at the cost of the perpetrator receiving a lighter sentence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweetypie/8
if you were a rapist paddy you would deserve to die,remember rapists arent choosy about age groups,a child or a baby or a granny wouldnt matter to these b.......s and imo hanging is to good for them.
I agree with you (given absolute 100% proof of guilt). However, my point was that if the penalty for rape is the death penalty then it would encourage a rapist/paedo/whatever to go that step further as they have NOTHING to lose by doing it.

Penalty for murder = death penalty
Penalty for rape = death penalty

Having done the rape where's the disincentive to going on to murder?

Actually rather than there being a disencentive, there is now an incentive to go on to kill as its much harder to get a conviction where the victim can't give evidence.
Paddy1 is offline   Reply With Quote