Quote:
Originally Posted by BenMcr
Can I just point out on this that ISPreview is wrong about Virgin changing its T&Cs to allow Phorm
The part they have quoted (G2) is in the original T&Cs issued in Feb 2007.
|
Shh... don’t spoil a good story. Section G has come from section 8 of ntl’s
old Terms & Conditions. What was previously 8.3.i now appears as G.2.
It appears to me that it was intended to cover the purchase and use of services provided directly by ntl, and was never written with Phorm in mind. But, it does mean that when, presented with the question of Phorm, Virgin Media’s lawyers would have been able to say that Virgin Media were probably covered already.