Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
What you require is a meta tag like the robots meta tag.
Perhaps an easier solution would be the one described in the link below, allowing you to reclaim royalties for unauthorised commercial exploitation of your content;
Copyright, Royalties and Invoicing |
Yes - the metatag is the obvious one, but I don't recall anything from Webwise/Phorm/BT that says they are looking at the metatags. They have been SO vague about robots.txt and unless I've missed it, there has been nothing about metatags. Please - if anyone has anything concrete explaining how they deal with noindex,nofollow metatags, please do post it.
I know that for some this is "not the issue" - but it seems that even if the way Phorm/Webwise/BT are looking at it has practical holes in it then it tends to cause more embarrassment for them and more pressure.
I agree that the real issue is the legality of the interception in the first place, and the need for explicit, informed, rather than implied consent, but I am trying to challenging the way even their "implied" consent model works.
Let's keep em busy!