Quote:
Originally Posted by OldBear
RE: the BT removed thread.
What really annoys me about this sort of censorship is, you can post on that forum that BT are crap, their system is crap, their CS is crap, or their equipment is crap and you get a reply from a Mod offering ways to sort your problem out, but mention Phorm/Webwise anywhere other than where they want you to post (i.e in a thread they won't reply to) and it gets censored or, more likely, removed. Disgusting!!!
OB
|
All those items you describe that a Mod responds to are basically about BT's incompetence or inefficiency. Both may indicate a poorly run organization but it is not illegal. Phorm on the other hand involves illegal interception and they are clearly trying to contain the spread of information by forcing it into a thread that many members or viewers would not naturally gravitate to. That, despite their intransigence, suggests that they do believe they are on uncertain ground and are afraid of the significance of Phorm publicity going mainstream.
Despite the extraordinary efforts of a number of people and some undoubted successes IMHO more than 90% of VM BT and Talk Talk customers still do not know of the existence of Phorm and BT at least will do their damnedest to prevent that.
After all when they do run their test they don't want only to get refuseniks!
