With Kent keep saying it is privacy international that has given phorm the pass he is infact tainting that also what saddens me is Simon doesn't correct Kent when he missleads the public yet it is the public that Simon used to protect. Once phorm goes live all the work privacy international does will be devalued all over the world.
As the saying is it only takes one bad apple in this case kent to turn the barrel.
It is only us now fighting to stop this intrusion into our privacy we have no other protection there is nothing out there but alexander now and the fact thet customers can leave to join ISPs who do value their customers, treat them as human beings with rights and not just another number to con.
Perhaps the best thing Simon could do is not publish this report at all since Kent has already broken promises to Simon, one being the Video which is still mising on another note seems strage the only live videos on the internet has now been hacked twice only winner Kent. Are BT, VM and talktalk really willing to become accomplacies in this type suspicious links.
Would anyone ever trust their business plans again with the phorm on the network, past history on phorm management, can they be sure he will only harvest what he said and nothing would ever make the customer identifyable. Are they prepared to face the consequencies if a customer ended up being identified by the phorm system to hackers, con artists etc?
Who needs phorm whe Yahoo can protect the surfer as they search.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7385285.stm with no links like the ISP to persoanl data IE. Name, Address and bank details..