Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
OK I am disengaging. I will not sit around on my Saturday afternoon watching bruised egos go at each other like cats and dogs. It is not even remotely constructive.
Alexander Hanff
|
Oh dear. To be fair this has nothing to do with you beyond that it is public.
I've made my statements concerning things stated about me where I believed those things to be harsh and misplaced. I have defended myself and I'd feel that was enough unless what I say is later countered.
I don't have a bruised ego. I just don't shy from confrontation when I am in the right.
---------- Post added at 13:28 ---------- Previous post was at 13:25 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by declanh
well If Kent only meant Google and other search engines then his statement that everything you do when online is stored against your IP address is just plain wrong and should have been challenged ??
All your searches being stored is very different to all your online activity.
Searches would be 1% of my online activity if even that....
|
I know and there was a little tongue in cheek in my reply so you can't take it as fact. But the gist of what I am saying is correct. Kent believes that because we are already tracked on our way around the web ( Google is usually the name he trots out first ) then we have no right to object to Phorm.
The way I see it is so what? I don't actually care what google does. I've never seen a Google add anyway and anything relating to them is adblocked. I do care that Phorm want to intercept my communication data, much of which is sensitive, and hawk it out like I'm a cheap whore.