[Kursk]

Originally Posted by Pasanonic

I have simply stated my view that given there is a specific framework in place for the management of such tasks I fail to see how certain areas of the process could have been followed and that If upon publication of that PIA it proves to be the case that certain criteria have not been met ( and given the subsequent information posted it would appear this will be the case ) then questions should be asked about the whole of the document regarding the screening process, the criteria followed and the people who have authored the document and their qualifications for doing such a task.

I was pointing out areas that may need to be questioned so that anyone concerned about it might know where to look to start that questioning.

And yes. I did use the term "not worth the paper it is printed upon" but if you bother to understand the context I said that I would suggest that in response to R Jones pointing out that 80/20 had already stated that the PIA was started too late and they were disappointed with that. If you can't do it properly then what value does it hold? I think that is a valid question.

Seriously I just raised questions about something that I feel I have every right to question and to be accused of making wild accusations against people and their reputation just won't do.

You have every right to state your opinion and I agree with it. Unfortunately, I said much the same a little while back and got shot down in flames. It's a hard knock life. It's good though .