Quote:
Originally Posted by R Jones
As the BT Webwise/Phorm trials theoretically approach, (due by May 26th according to latest BT claims)
|
Love the language RJ, "Theoretically" - LOL - Indeed!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Jones
YOU say it's legal but refuse to give me the details. How do you rebutt Nicholas Bohm from FIPR?
What is your answer to Alex Hanff?
Point by point please?
RIPA?
DPA?
Fraud Act?
PECR?
Civil liability to website owners?
If you won't do this, then you are refusing to inform me properly about Webwise. I can't make an informed choice.
|
I agree, I can't make an inphormed choice either - so they have to provide this detail for it to be 'informed'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry@VMedia
Man my hat goes off to you Alex, for if I was sitting there I could not stand all that butting in, interrupting & his frankly lying answers!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
No one's deriding the methodology. Its the wish to see that methodology applied by someone with the highest ethical/privacy standards that's causing concern.
|
Agreed - I did not see your derision of the methodology either (even in the quoted post). Ceedee seems to be saying we should not critique some specifics around the current output from Simon but I don't see why these should go unchallenged because this is a public forum and unless the challenge became personal or an invasion of privacy in some way, then I don't think it's wrong in a democracy.
It IS important that we await the PIA before making any final judgements on it, but I don't see the harm in debate or speculation now as long as it is properly read, considered and responded to in a reasoned manner when it does arrive.
Specualtion isn't pointless (IMO only) because in the absence of facts today it sparks debate and conversation about this whole sordid issue, which is why people come here to a forum to take part. Unfortunately for some of us tho, there is painting to be done and I will be shot by you know who if it is not finished today (or at least the ceiling!)
Got an unexpected letter from the Earl of Northesk today, but I'll share later.
Have phun
Hank