View Single Post
Old 03-05-2008, 09:49   #5489
ceedee
cf.geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bath
Services: 100Mb VM Broadband
Posts: 825
ceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond reputeceedee has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedee View Post
Please think of the implications of deriding the methodology of the 80/20 PIA and Simon's reputation for independence before posting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank View Post
Has anyone queried the methodology? Sorry if I missed that somewhere. I think the methodology set out is good.

The issue will be, have they followed it? The PIA will be assessed itself when it finally arrives (and better late than never in my view if that helps get a quality output - one which has followed the methodology a good PIA should follow)

What you maybe are meaning to say ceedee, is don't judge it before we've seen it? The problem is that speculation happens because there is a void until it arrives (not helped by the video fiasco)
Deriding (not just querying) and undermining the PIA (and it's authors) before it's published is unhelpful.

Speculation is pointless but understandable.
But just because my mouth is open (a void) it doesn't mean I have to stick my foot in it...
ceedee is offline