Quote:
Originally Posted by jca111
I'm afraid I just don't agree! I love what your doing, I really do - but we obviously just don't see eye-to-eye on this one. Sorry Alex.
|
I trust 80/20 to do a good job on the PIA, and I want to see the finished product. Hang in there Simon.
---------- Post added at 00:01 ---------- Previous post was yesterday at 23:52 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasanonic
Makes perfect sense to me.
snip
I reiterate though that this current proposal by Phorm is a non-starter and if the PIA says anything different I expect I shall be the first to cry foul. I especially will be getting my ICO PIA handbook out and requiring answers to questions regarding the framework of the PIA, the initial screening process and especially asking to see that all ICO criteria for a full scale ( which is required seeing as this is a high risk privacy area ) PIA were rigorously adhered to. ( something I doubt as I have seen no mention of any polling of the people most affected by this. i.e. Us, the ISP consumers.
I certainly feel that the stakeholder analysis criteria will not have been fully met.
regards
Craig.
|
Simon already pointed out in the interim privacy report that a proper PIA was not in fact possible, owing to the late stage at which he was asked to do it. He points out that he will be following a PIA methodology, but for a proper PIA he should have been in there at the beginning, not after the technology had all already been designed and set up. He then gives a list of all the bad things that result from leaving the PIA till late in the process. Most of those bad things have indeed happened including frantic retrophitting of the technology by BT and a massive loss of trust by the public.