Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
I never have any luck with the BBC inline player so I will have to wait for the iPlayer version to come online. Can you give me a brief summary of the piece?
Alexander Hanff
|
Well done Alexander. The piece was obviously heavily edited.
It started with a lot of stock phorm guff giving their view of how it worked.
As you predicted, they could not show much of the interview without showing a 'raging Kent' and unfortunately that's what they did. It was quite tame.
The interviewer asked you to shake hands at the end etc, and indicated he was all 'hot and flustered', but if you had not have told us about Kent's behaviour, I wouldn't have known why.
All in all it was very tame. Other people may have things to add.