Quote:
Originally Posted by The Other Steve
http://www.out-law.com/page-9090
About what you'd expect given Pinsent Masons LLP's relationship with BT, basically says that, yes, ISPs implementing Phorm are probably breaking tons of laws, but that's OK, where's the harm ?
Seriously, that's what it says. Can't comment further now, blood boiling.
|
i sent comments about their clear avoidence of the exiting RIPA breaking 2006/7 trials.
and also pointed out yet again..., about the clear potential of the Bt executives and employee's involved in its activation and running being under threat of a real criminal conviction , pointing again to the clear existing case law.
"remember RIPA conviction for UK executives case law already exists.
the lost RIPA appeal of Stanford's
http://www.lawdit.co.uk/reading_room...20Stanford.htm
"
Stanford Loses Criminal Appeal
3 February 2006
Stanford Loses Criminal Appeal...."
i assume many of you here have done so too by now!