Quote:
Originally Posted by dav
|
So that gives the latest predicted trial start date as no later than 26th May then?
And by then BT will have done the following?
Written to the entire World Wide Web of webmasters and got their inphormed consent?
Worked out a way of issuing a trial invitation without making an illegal interception? (ie doing it via BT/BTYahoo's own web pages only while their customers are logged in, and not by illegally, and without consent, intercepting an ordinary http request to a 3rd party site?
Worked out a legal way of planting phorged cookies phraudulently purporting to be from a 3rd party website, on our computers, without the domain owner's inphormed consent?
Worked out a legal way of intercepting web traffic at a Layer 7 level without the inphormed consent of webmasters?
Worked out detailed answers to all the questions posed by FIPR in their most recent paper by Nicholas Bohm? Their customers will not be able to make an inphormed choice without knowing the answers to the legal questions. BT customers cannot simply rely on the bland reassurances of their ISP. We NEVER trusted Kent Ertugrul and his Phorm/Webwise/121Media/PeopleonPage outfit. And we no longer trust BT, after they forfeited our trust by their underhand actions and denials.
So only by giving us those detailed answers can we make an inphormed choice about your trials.
So will the next 28 days involve giving us those answers - or just more evasive silence?