Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry@VMedia
Hi & sorry to butt in, i have been a long time lurker (how much woodwork does this place have) and i have been meaning to join but tonight was finally the time!
I've been trying to keep up with this mamouth subject for the last few weeks and i am finally up to date!
As reguards to the zdnet article, i feel that they are not grasping the point that no matter how badly phorm try to sell itself it is still ILEGAL, no matter how much spin they put on it, so with this in mind, why hasnt more sites that report on this phorm subject stating that this is ilegal and any provider of internet that accepts this is breaking the law?
All i keep seeing is its a better service than google and this bullcrap about extra security webwise provides, why cant these 'reporters' report on the most important facts of all - it is illegal?
if i had an online 'newspaper' i would just simply state "This phorm malarky is illegal, weither optin or opt out period, why are these people not grasping the true facts?
|
Hi and
think one has to first look at what is happening then look at which people are being quiet, cagey, passing the book then you might get your answer.
The ISPs have seen £££ signs for our details (
OUR) clicks etc the government see this as a way to spy on what we see on the Internet so unless we boot Labour out of power and then kick our ISPs where it hurts them most ( by moving our internet to ISPs that will be phorm phree) this will be a hard fight.
Too many are doing selective reading and hoping that most internet uses will be good like sheep and herd along the paths these ppl want to drive us down.
We need to keep kicking and screaming to show we will not lie down and play ball .