Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
The point is "may"
If someone deliberately sets out to kill another person, such as kicking them to death, then they have committed murder.
If someone pushes another person into a pool of water after injuring them, it can be argued that they didn't intend to kill the person, only scare them or injure them further.
How's about this one.
You find out your wife is having an affair.
Insane with the situation, you get hold of a gun, and use it to force your neighbour to drive you to your wife and her lover.
You rush in and shoot both of them dead.
While you can claim diminished responsibility, your neighbour cannot, despite being held at gunpoint, and so can end up in court on charges of accessory to murder.
Barristers are currently arguing for changes to the murder laws so that this bizarre situation won't arise.
|
If I was the driver my defence would be a) I didn;t know I was being driven to a murder and more importantly, b)
I was held at gunpoint forced to drive to somewhere I didnt know a murder was to be committed.
I think you would have to have a very dodgy brief to actually go down as an accessory to murder in the above case.