View Single Post
Old 28-04-2008, 02:21   #50
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek S View Post
They were acting together, it doesn't matter who dealt the killing blow, one could have caused an injury which would have proved fatal later on.
Or are you suggesting if 5 people shoot a person and kill him only one can be charged with murder?
We don't charge groups, we charge individuals. That's why muder can be difficult to get a conviction for when a group was involved.
Using your example, the killing shot would have to be proven.
For instance, 4 shoot someone in the bum, 1 shoots them in the head.
Should the 4 that aimed for the bum be convicted of murder when their shots weren't fatal?
Xaccers is offline